Re: [colorforth] Re-connecting

[alice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Nice to hear more from Terry, and to see that Mark has decided not to
unsubscribe after all! :)  

Interesting, that the "connect" thread has moved (logically?) from communication
to filing.  "Only connect" (E.M.Forster) - first, with other people and then,
with the info they have given you.  I like the idea of Forth's
free/hierarchical structure being a middle way between filing as "heap of
papers on my desk"  and filing as "putting things in little boxes".

Nick Maroudas    

Quoting Terry Loveall <loveall@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:12:28 -0500 (EST)
> Mark Slicker <maslicke@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Terry Loveall wrote:
> > 
>snip>
> > >
> > > snip> .... Maybe an OS file structure is not needed but
> > > some form of 'filing' is. Unless you like sorting thru a heap on your
> > > desktop :-)
> > >
> > 
> > Its funny, that is a literal description of my physical desktop. Heaps of 
> > papers, no particular organization. I wonder if the inventer of file 
> > system metaphor was a type of neat and orderly person, keen on 
> > labeling things and puting them in containers. Perhaps he was user of 
> > physical filling system.
> 
> Nick here:  My wife, Alice, uses that same fs:  her heaps of papers.  A very
good fs for Alice, because she has an excellent sense of time, so can soon
locate the "geological stratum" in which the required papers lie.  Her father,
a succesful lawyer, used the same system, so the fs must be an example of a
cultural attribute being "inherited" because it suits a particular mental
heredity.  And woe betide the maidservant (in the good old days) or the husband
(in modern times) who disturbed those strata by "tidying up".

              I myself have no sense of time or place, so I am forced to "put
things into little boxes".  But I do have a feel for "affinities", so a
semi-hierarchical linkage of words (Forth style) might be a good way for me to
group the labels on my little boxes.

>Terry again:
> Or it may be that the number of 'pages' got to be too large. Could you
> maintain that desktop if each stack held many thousands of pages and you
> needed access to it in different ways several times a day?
> 
> > There are opportunities for the computer system to do the filling. 
> > Some existing examples are email, where the emails are presented as they 
> > are received in a temporal order. 

> Nick again:  Temporal order in her email, year after year, suits Alice just
fine.  

>> Some email clients allow other 
> > presentations like by sender, for example. This is similer to the example 
> > you give above, with sorting files within a folder by different criteria. 
> > (snip)
> > My critique of hierarchical file systems is that they put too much burden 
> > on the user, to give each file a name and place within the hierarchy. ..
> 
> Nick:  You can say that again!  I spend an awful lot of time sorting this CF
List into my little boxes labelled Terry, Mark, Tim, ... etc.

> (snip)
> Forth, with a nested vocabulary structure, can provide the basis for
> 'attribute typed' data storage. The basic managed 'physical' tree structure
> is
> provided by the vocabulary nesting.
> (snip)
> But all of the above could be applied to conventional OS design. See some of
> the recent write-ups on beOS. With colorForth, the opportunity is at hand to
> try it again.
> 
> Regards,
> Terry Loveall
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com