Re: [colorforth] To kernel, or not to kernel
- Subject: Re: [colorforth] To kernel, or not to kernel
- From: Oninoshiko <oninoshiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 03:05:21 -0600 (CST)
> 1, 2, 3, and , are good enough for implementing primitives. I agree with you
> completely.
> Though I'd like to have a sufficient set of primitives for... here the game
> begins -- sufficient for what purposes ? :)
to be turing complete?
> Maybe I missed something, but isn't adding an assembler somewhat missing
> the point of colorForth? It seems to me that it places too much emphasis
> on the aspect of PC colorForth that is the PC, and not the aspect of
> colorForth that is machineForth.
as i see it, yes, this is correct.
oninoshiko
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com
