Re: Taos paper (fwd) (long)
- To: ui22204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: Taos paper (fwd) (long)
 
- From: rdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 20:20:35 -0400
 
- CC: MISC
 
- In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950816223554.21041d@sun2> (message from Eugen Leitl on Wed, 16 Aug 1995 22:43:50 +0200 (MET DST))
 
- Reply-to: rdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
These people sure are modest, though I'm not sure if I really need to
buy a holy grail.
More to the point, this paper doesn't give a hint of how to design
properly for a taos system.  [e.g. what kind of time penalty does
message passing have?  Where's the tradeoff between "the complete Open
System" and "programs [that] can take advantage of special purpose
hardware to run specific objects?"
And, as with any sparkling new technology, I really want to know: how
is it being disseminated into the educational system?  Any industrial
"literacy requirement" which isn't supported by educators is going to
wither.
[Hmm... I suppose some of these comments might apply to misc as well.]
-- 
Raul