Re: SHARC
vic plichota writes:
> >I'd beg to differ. I wrote a Forth for the ADSP2181, the SHARC's
> >16 bit sibling, and it was really, really fast. The '2181 at
> >33 MHz runs Forth about as fast as an 8 MHz RTX2001.
>
>
> That's why I got excited, but but I still say that the SHARC req's
> verrry fussy optimizing.
Possibly, but I guess one will to write the hotspots in handcrafted
assembly anyway.
> >And I was generating 640x350 monochrome video at the same time.
>
> Bravo! I just *love* it when I am proven wrong -- If it doesn't
> violate any trade-secrets, please post the code to me -- my previous
> SHARC design had it coupled to a TMS 34020...
Yes, please. I would love to see some code, too. Perhaps the 32 bit
SHARC is not too different so that I have some use for it. Did you use
the EZ-LITE kit for development?
>
> cheers - vic
>
