home .. forth .. misc mail list archive ..

Re[2]: F21 docs, + an administrative question

To: "vic plichota" <atsvap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: F21 docs, + an administrative question
From: Eugene Leitl <eugene.leitl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 22:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Jeff Fox" <Jfox@xxxxxxxxx>, <misc>
In-Reply-To: <004f01bfcfea$edab8100$381c8d18@hala1.on.home.com>
References: <08638BDFEF82D3119BAA00A0C955329511AF27@DISCOVERY><004f01bfcfea$edab8100$381c8d18@hala1.on.home.com>

vic plichota writes:

 > None whatsoever!  I have a keen acedemic interest in the *F*21, but
 > my current concerns use a floating-point DSP.

SHARC, is it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re[2]: F21 docs, + an administrative question
  - From: vic plichota

References:
- RE: F21 docs, + an administrative question
  - From: Jeff Fox
- Re[2]: F21 docs, + an administrative question
  - From: vic plichota

Previous by thread: Re[2]: F21 docs, + an administrative question
Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: F21 docs, + an administrative question
Index(es):
- Thread